is no doubt a UFO researcher and parapsychologist that continues to open up the wonderful world of the esoteric, using the story as a bridge academic, exhaling respect for the discipline at every step
Teaching your thing, no doubt. No sooner penetrates one in his writings begins a journey of learning, invoking the shaman or magician or alchemist who carries within
"I will not be an iconoclast today. Only I will explore other alternative. This is linked to lternativa a very interesting phenomenon known as geometric-topological "band (or tape) Moebius" , named after its discoverer, the Swiss physicist and astronomer August Ferdinand Möbius [2] , who, however, despite the almost intellectual obsession accompanied him the rest of his life, he could not explain. " (From" Looking for other dimensions: EXPLORING THE CRACKS OF THE SACRED GEOMETRY
)
Or the student that goes without fear or suspicion on slippery surfaces or issues ríspidas:
" About the Illuminati in Argentina have already demonstrated in this series and in our previous work," Esoteric and political power in Argentina "fully that point. What about the second?. Especially at the dawn of the nation when the presence Illuminati, paradoxically, was stronger and evident in function of the weak public statements, the small population and limited room for ciudadabnía illustrated. That is the missing data.
have experienced UFO Extraterrestrial Hypothesis passing of the Scenario Extra-dimensional, covering all the issues linked from sleeping visitors, collective hallucinations, contacts, ... ... debunkeo
I'm talking about my friend Gustavo Fernández
Gustavo Fernandez was born in City of Buenos Aires in 1958, but for more than twenty years is based in Paraná, capital of the province of Entre Rios, Argentina. Writer with 17 published books to his credit, Director of "Edge of Reality"-free digital magazine about alternative topics, UFOs and parapsychology, and continued presence in the Web for 11 years of vocation and professional parapsychologist, Director of the Center for Integral Approximation (cultural institution), travels constantly for his country and Latin America giving lectures and workshops on the topics addressed. In the field of UFO research, land that has always been preferred, their research contributions dating from the mid 70's and continued uninterrupted until today, making him earn a place in its own right in Argentina Ufology. On that occasion, makes a stop in your busy life with lectures, interviews and television radiesl, geography extensive travels in Argentina and Latin America and receives us. A must mate with, took us two hours wandering around the core of informal questioning, jumping "no network" in the most intimate aspects of his career and personality
At what age did you aware of your tendency toward the paranormal?
In fact, there is nothing mysterious behind it. I was always a compulsive reader, with parents who had the sense to give books to the extent of that greed. And back in 1969, I with 11 years old, the UFO was predominant in the pages of newspapers. So, as ever, even from small-I like to talk about a subject and as ignorant of school Primary was the talk of recess, for a Saturday shopping, I asked my father to buy a book on UFOs. I still remember: "The flying saucers and their crew", Alberto Giordano and Col. (RE) Tucci, Editorial Glenn. That book got me up in the morning, when he finally finished. And followed by another and another and another. Then I began, I suppose it clumsily, to turn to UFO research. My first public lecture I gave at the 15, my first television appearance at 16 (and had to have courage or irresponsibility in those years to appear on television talking about flying saucers, but in my defense I prefer to assume that as a teenager who was, courage was television producer) and my first book, "Ships Manned Extraterrestrial" Editorial Dronte, at 17. It's funny: it was an "almost" best selling very rapidly in Argentina and Mexico, and I had to go bothering my father to attend editorial meetings and signing of contracts because, as a minor, had no such right. , and was 18 that I realized that the physical explanation - mechanistic origin and nature of the UFO did not answer all my questions. So I started to dabble in the Paranormal. A long road that brought me here.
What books on UFOs, all you've written, you were published?
As I said, "Ships Manned Extraterrestrial" in 1976, "Deadly Triangle in Argentina" (1978), "Paranormal and UFO in Entre Ríos" (1991) "Aliens in the past argentino" (1997) and "UFOs on the Twin Towers "(2007).
Which of them has given you most satisfaction?
In what sense?. If the impact is undoubtedly "UFOs on the Twin Towers." But I really enjoyed preparing "Deadly Triangle in Argentina" was then just 20 years old and needs of its editorial staff took me to make my first trip, tentatively, by the geography of my country in search of evidence and material backpack. That woke up my other passions, that of transhumance, which, of course, was to expand over the years and the possibilities. As for that best expresses my thoughts, is a still unpublished, "Shamans of the Stars." But I have not gotten publisher for it, perhaps because it is too bold and offender ...
Ufology Do you think that has evolved over the past two decades? If so, tell me why
Basically, going from one Ufology of "nuts and bolts" (the reduction simplistic to see these ships, physical, manned or not, from distant worlds, the hypothesis dimensional, which means (a UFO) entities or vectors from parallel universes. If I had to simplify the reason, I would say that the extraterrestrial hypothesis, as long as seek to explain all the cases, while not denying that in a reduced percentage if applicable) sins by several shortcomings. The first, considering the enormous amount of UFO sightings throughout the day certificates mubdo, there are two explanations: either we are in the midst of a cosmic super-congested that it would be more than a twist of anthropocentrism, or their visits are so frequent because, simply, "come from next door." Interpenetrating a parallel universe to ours. As simple as it will be interplanetary or intergalactic travel, to assume that millions of miles across space to land, collect some samples and go is a waste of energy (physical, psychological, temporal).
What you Argentine investigators opened a gap?
Even without knowing them personally, Uriondo Oscar and Oscar Galindez. Of the latter, his defunct magazine "UFO, a desafdío to science" was the core of my intellectual pursuits during my adolescence. But, especially, the late Cyrus Rietti Ariel, whom I joined a casual knowledge (I dare not call it friendship), opening many times the doors of his house and archives, and whom I etched a phrase that never I forgot, "the difficult things we do right away. The impossible, tardaos a bit more. "
Have you participated in any other field research with indigenous ufologists? Which ones?
I not forget either, and I cite those with whom I shared more days and nights, miles traveled, public debates, as Alexander Chionetti, Adalberto Ujvari, Antonio Heras, Luis Burgos, Martha Gonzalez, Thomas Latino, Daniel Padilla, Juan Sebastian Pagano, Edgardo Fontanet. Some of them have already retired, others remain untouched in the trenches.
Field investigations, dozens. And if I had to bring the case to me most trapped, which is known as "D'Elia Colonia case, where the appearance of UFOs in the area joined that of a" werewolf "(?) seen around a family and when we were present at the luiar, our team photographed the bush, a reptilian-looking being, biped, apparently dressed in a robe. All accompanied by experienced paranormal phenology for us.
a topic you really passionate about because that was the case knew transmit the Estancia Aurora. Do you want to tell us something of it?
For me it was very important because there phenomenology occurred during years marked a turning point in my time of "ufology materialist" to a more "metaphysical" (in the strict etymological sense of the word). Recall that from 1988 until well into the 90's in this room of Salto, Uruguay, a family, surnamed Tonna witnessed frequent UFO overflights and landings even groves destroyed the place. Pilgrimages began to produce true enthusiasts, some of whom began to tell true sagas of contact as well as apparitions of nuns who had more than aliens, like the father Pio of Pietrelcina. Also, there were spontaneous remissions from serious illnesses and spiritual changes marcadísimos in many visitors. I think here we have an exciting example of the paranormal component of the UFO phenomenon, and I wonder if these objects caused all this to those people, or because these people came to these emotional burdens to the place attracted the UFO.
With reference to two cases I would like to know your opinion: If Cabot or the flying cow and Case Vidal.
The first one I have not deepened, and I never liked to talk about what I do not know. In For the latter, there is a rationalistic tendency of some colleagues who thinks she explained as the proportional strategy a bad movie of the year Argentina 60 ("Che, UFO). Not convince me, and I give my arguments. No, not my great merit, was not the result of a search dusty film archives of collectors. Just a coincidence?. One day, I left work early (around 23:50) on my computer, made myself a coffee, and as I prepared to sleep early, I reached for the TV remote control. "Discovery Channel?," National Geographic Channel?, "The History Channel?. But what do you suppose?.
What am a full-time intellectual boring?. No, sorry to disappoint you: I thought it was an indescribable film comedian Alberto Olmedo, and I was wrong.
Because the tune to the Buenos Aires "Volver" (devoted entirely to a retrospective of the stale television in Argentina) a dislocated presentation caught my attention. Jorge Sobral, Erika Wallner, Javier Portales ... "Those sound like me ... only need to be "Che, UFO
, I thought.
And it was "Che, UFO, just.
So I was stuck watching TV because, after a controversy as exciting as that in those days just holding supporters and opponents of rational explanation, I had to see it. Nailing and progressively asleep because I must admit, the film is appalling. Inconsistent. Even with the best intentions "cult" (and I do not disgust films Ed Wood), or context "kitsch" and "hippie" from the "happenings" of the late '60s can be digested. In short, the criticism was right to destroy. That's right: priceless interpretation of tango Jorge Sobral "Mi Buenos Aires querido." Word of Buenos Aires.
But it's clear desire to not see her movie buff but ufologists. And here I enjoyed a lot. Because
and (b ) is perfectly possible to write, shoot and edit that spawn in less than a couple of months. But this is not important.
important thing is that the only relationship between the episode and the film is that in this, as noted, a couple is "abducted by a UFO on a route from Buenos Aires and appears on the outskirts of Madrid. If the case was a "hoax" promotional, why do not appear in Madrid in the newspaper version, or, in the film in Mexico, as has the species?. And this is the end all relations: no haze that envelops the car, no burn marks on it ... Most importantly, it is not even the same type of car, something that Ruben Morales writes: " see in the picture already poster, illustration of the self corresponds well with a Peugeot. It is very likely that the brand will sponsor the film, because in the same Peugeots appear repeatedly, and is the vehicle used by the main protagonists
And if you think it's just a "minor detail" if 403 or 404, we note that the appearance of both is markedly different (Model 403 has leakage of the roof, front and rounded rear, while the 404 is characterized by right angles, especially in the back where the form known as the old mechanical "fish fins.
The ambiguity over Alejandro Agostinelli is great, who in his rebuttal article believe they have found the key to all fraud writes "The film details a tango singer in the night, as he finger, is collected in a Peugeot 403 as Case Vidal, a beautiful blonde.
. " Error!. NO is a Peugeot 403!. Or the source of information was the film director Alejandro Uset and over the years the poor man suffers amnesia, senile or falsifier journalist went to another source ... obviously misinformed. By transitive, then how can we accept this scaffolding of disinformation?.
Among ufologists who remain faithful to the HET, whom do you read with respect, that is with confidence that what they say they have verified their right to understand?
The collective
Brazilian UFO Magazine, "Juanjo" Benitez, Stanton Friedman, Ignacio Darnaude - Rojas, Luis Burgos, but also I tiptoed to my friend Scott Corrales and read and reread whenever Jacques Vallée.
Starting as UFO investigator, and little by little you seem to have been leaning towards more metaphysical issues. Why?
is simple. If someone looks at my first, inexperienced years, will see part of the inevitable bunch of "nuts and bolts", ie those who argued that UFOs were extraterrestrial vehicles definitely (and only that), a projection of our own technological developments. Years, casuistry, and above all, reflections, were inducing me to accept that showed huge gaps mechanistic hypothesis. Looking up, I went first to the Paranormal, the most orthodox and methodological almost hieratic curiously began to delve into spiritual texts and esoteric not only to me face to face with many of the answers but also (not less) sense to my life. Then I told myself that if I wanted to progress, had to devote as much time as possible, so I left college formal (also in formal employment, formal bridal, formal friends ...) and I turned completely to the research and practice of these disciplines. But I could never straying too far from my first "love" UFOlogy, so many investigations, field or desk, it always turned on. Thus, defender of the extradimensional intelligences hypothesis of parallel universes or visit us (in addition to visitors also aliens, certainly more sporadic) I poured my conclusions in essays like "Shaman of the stars" (that compiles studies on the origin of these objects ultradimensional), "The hypothesis of abduction as esoteric initiation) and also, why not, my book "UFOs on the Twin Towers", written in collaboration with my colleague and good friend Thomas Latino, and where the meeting of documentary evidence of the presence of intelligently designed objects for the attack on the WTC is the excuse to once again Hypothesis enter Extradimensional.
Does that have approached or away from your colleagues?
I'm not aware of it, worse if I had to sketch an intuitive perception, not certainty, that many colleagues would continue my writing and share my views almost, almost, from the underground, but this prudish Ufology and airs pseudo ranking bureaucrat with institutional and media acclaim (that this is a good part of UFOlogy Argentina) call "serious investigation" to display warm uncommitted positions statements, yes, abundantly provided with a vocabulary too boring and pseudo technician, who, of course, it sounds scientific. Proof?: Many are "friends" through private mail and in personal conversations, but make exits through the forum when in any idem (forum) criticize "what is right, me cover my theories and insults-which is not as well-But certainly not afraid of a small group exposure to discredit by calling her "friend" and quote me.
If you had to cite a case mix that would point to as proof of your opinion, what would cite?
The problem of holding a theory about an alleged "perfect case" is a fallacy, because there is not one who is, as long as one hand, witnesses are human and other, has decided intention to disprove skeptics with conventional explanations. I think much stronger hold an opinion on what I call the "general atmosphere of UFOlogy", ie adding the personal touch to the controls (always scarce in the UFO universe logical) reading researchers in the most diverse aspects and reflection on the bigger picture as possible of the phenomenon. I think it's good that some researchers put the magnifying glass on every witness, every case. I think it's best a few meters away and watch the whole.
What about Argentina casuistry?
Several cases, in my humble opinion, are truly "classical" ufology not only Argentina but global. Although some colleagues apply other criteria, I prioritized three. Or four, if you ask me, namely:
The "Trancas case." On October 21, 1963 a family based in the town of Trancas, in the province of Tucumán, people, moreover, with tertiary education and linked to prominent members of the Argentine Army, suffered for a long night of the siege of a group of ships and their crews parked on a railroad track near their home, to the point of attack to make consistent preventing heat and light peek outside the home.
The Case Bariloche, support to line the airliner July 31, 1995 near the resort town of Black River Province.
The Case disappointed when the July 3, 1965 an object fell on the military base in Antarctica and namesake was photographed not only the technical and military personnel, but also detected by magnetovariómetros, which spoke to clear self-propelled physical bodies that generated very intense electromagnetic fields.
spiritual or religious Why?
Spirituality, religion ever. Because there is no religion without dogmas, no "wall up" spiritual quest, without imposing roads marked by others, perhaps useful to them but not necessarily for me. I feel like a lone sniper spirituality. Because while "religion" is one thing and "church" other (or should be), eventually all institutionalized religious structure. Atomization Welcome search, irreverent anarchy sublime think what you like and respect in others that same right.
In your book "UFOs over Torres Twin "will penetrate into the question Illuminati." That has brought you any problems?
No, and it makes sense. First, my work, regardless if they are deep or original, are just a drop of oil in the sea of \u200b\u200bmisinformation floating Illuminati theme, especially in its most prickly, their alleged connection with extraterrestrial intelligence. And secondly, if something happens to me, would not the absolute certification that he was right ?
But is not it a bit sensationalist to say that during this tragedy were aliens present?
things first. First, I did not write that they are necessarily "aliens." He talked about flying objects directed intelligently, which is another thing. By the way, my friend and colleague Thomas Latino, which accompanied me with previous research that led to writing this paper-does contend that nonhumans were "monitoring" this attack, hinge on the contemporary history of mankind. I've reflected in the book have been three hypotheses to explain: the alien monitoring proposed by Thomas, that it was teleridigidos objects linked to these "Illuminati" (the real perpetrators of this "inside job") who controlled that everything went as planned (and the possibility that these objects are the product of "reverse engineering" obtained from "true" ships non-human) and the third, the parapsychological hypothesis, which postulates that what is seen is an archetypal embodiment of the collective unconscious. It was the first time, live and live, millions of people attended each of the drama, the moment of death of many people. Moreover, there is scientific evidence that subliminal level global consciousness of mankind had tragic events early in the twenty-four hours before they happened.
But either way, this is an attempt at explanation. The irrefutable fact, as I demonstrate in my book, is that UFOs were there. "Rowdy?. "Trends?. Please, what fault I have to have been?. It would be irresponsible, knowing it, not spread it. Now, as I said, if alien spacecraft, monitoring probes "Illuminati" or psychic phenomena, which each draw their own conclusions.
How you got that evidence, that so many others have been gone unnoticed?.
Let me be clear: the origin of the evidence. It is not that someone has passed me an envelope with photographs surreptitiously under the door. Fewer, still, it is telepathic channeling. No. It is what was there, on TV, it all looked, but few were able to see. The fact is that Thomas, as a good researcher and sensing what was happening would be crucial to understand olos years, began recording in the Isle of video editing which all television channels, cable and open, Argentina, were broadcasting live. Collected, in total and for twenty-four hours, over a hundred hours of video. "They warned you that from September 12, there were a number of angles, shots of perspectives that we live but never came back into the air and that since then, are the same few images that are always repeated ?. That's because in the censored images from 12, appeared UFOs. So my only wealth is to have a friend and collaborator who recorded everything, even (and especially) which then never seen again, and so did our analysis.
What about female genital mutilation livestock?
I only studied the "surge mutilating" of 2002 in my country, Argentina. Therefore, I can not generalize my findings to ALL mutilation. But yes I have studied these in depth. What has enabled me to reach some conclusions, based on the work I've published in due course:
a) that the "surge mutilating" 2002 in Argentina was quite unusual, and nothing for-or etiologies or consequences - With gotten at different times in other parts of the world.
b) that this surge was maintained not by extraterrestrial or extradimensional intelligences, but rather land, perhaps linked to intelligence services, with two specific purposes:
1) mask the unwanted side effects Late bacteriological warfare experiments conducted in our country during the decade of 80 government agencies and foreign laboratories cooperation and assistance over the U.S. military.
2) divert attention from the public as a "spike" UFO exceptional occurrences that occurred in that year (and had been anticipating with statistical studies) linking a sound that would be explained with causes "natural "(a comic predation rodent) with this one that, by transitive, would also be reckless. Needless
clarify that most of my colleagues These investigations fell like a low blow, then, naturally, some seemed to need explanation .... extragalactic In this regard, and extending the comment to all strange cattle mutilations that have been recorded, I make a point: a civilization as advanced as it capable of traversing the cosmos to visit, do you need to amputate a few bodies here, another over there for your needs?. Is it not obvious that simply "abduct" a number of animals and recreate in some cosmic farm to do with them, and their children, what they want?. I think here we need other explanatory hypotheses, perhaps even more bizarre than the aliens. And I wonder if eplicar try these unusual phenomena from the perspective of interplanetary astronauts is not just another reading that society in a cultural moment, this, where space travel is daily.
Your such broad intellectual interests, do not aggravate the criticism of skeptics and immerse yourself in subjects viewed as lack of seriousness?
us distinguish the true skeptics, in the philosophical sense of the term, of those whom I call "panrrefutadores militants", a kind worthy of psychodiagnostic. They seem to know everything, because all critical (hence the "bread"). Part of assumptions, therefore, debunkers, skeptics, and not actively militate in attacking the farmers of these disciplines, which I think is abnormal, if I do not like football, not devote a minute of my life to sign up lists Post to fans of the show on the nonsense of 22 lords adults running after a ball ... just dedicate myself to what I do think, I am interested, I love.
But even if I stop to wonder about such attacks, say that beyond discussions of the roots and the destinations they good or evil-minded farmers have given to these para-scientific, like many ufologists disturbed to suffer skin rashes when a journalist clueless asked about the zodiac signs as well as some spiritualists coined frown if the question put to them by pointing to the motivations of the aliens. Obviously, natural and respectable that every fan of each of these sides seek to focus on considerations that do not leave the topic that dominates, however, is dangerous not to realize that the problem is not whether the Ufology is more "scientific" than this that parapsychology or astrology, but, respecting the dissent and critical intellectual space of each, all are twinned by a struggle and a common mission: to make a small contribution sand in the changing patterns of collective thought (paradigms) that this particular historical moment facing two conceptions of reality.
have a particular enthusiasm for the phenomena that are said to occur in the town of Capilla del Monte and its mythical Mount Uritorco, in the province of Córdoba
says not occurring phenomena. Phenomena do occur. I have witnessed, but that's the least important. What counts is that, for example, I have witnessed what happens to others, and that gives me the unique position of observer and analyst. And beyond appearances UFO, which may not be more significant, quantitatively speaking, than in many other parts of the world, the truly exciting place is that it brings to me what are the characteristics of what we call "portal "to put a little poetry, the place where the veil between this reality and other realities is so tenuous that, episodically, disappears. Indeed, in "Edge of Reality" I told a good number event where not only the mountain town is a place of paranormal phenomenology but what is most important to me, that phenomenology and changes inevitably impact the lives of their unwitting protagonists ...
Do you think there there Erks underground city?
Einstein said that the quality of a scientist is to question over breakfast what they firmly believed at dinner last night. Must be the only thing I seem to genius, and I achieved. Ever thought that the city does not exist, a product of the mythomania and delirium contacts. I still do not accept there physically, but today I suspect that the whole area is a "portal" to other dimensional planes, as I said and esse sense, it is possible that the "other side" has something like that in our paradigm we understand cities.
Let's talk about the mysterious continent: Antarctica. From everything written about the Nazi presence there, which could be summarized in the phrase triumph of Admiral Dönitz, who commanded Fleet submarines Third Reich and then transcribe
" Die deutsche U-Boot Flotte ist stolz darauf, daß sie für den Führer in einem anderen Teil der Welt ein Shangri-La gebaut hat, eine Festung uneinnehmbare "
and faithful translation of which is:" German submarine fleet is proud to have built for the Führer , elsewhere in the world, a Shangri-La , an impregnable fortress ", until the discovery of fresh-water lake under the ice of the eastern that has captivated the scientific world, there are countless stories of UFO activity in that continent, and even military interventions with clear goals cover the information or use knowledge provided by extraterrestrial biological entities. Also, I'd be interested to expand the scope of this inquiry sightings occurred during the Falklands War between Argentina and in England. What could we inform the respect?
Divide both issues. Associate UFO secret aircraft developed by the Third Reich spor is not an original topic. And I do believe that they were experienced in the form of prototypes, but not to the extreme, as some authors argue, to achieve the interplanetary flight. And clear that the Nazis tried to establish the "Shangri - La" (the choice of the term by Doenitz is not idle, because it reveals the fusion between the Nazi esoteric and Tibetan) in Patagonia or Antarctica, but I suspect it did not. However, there are pieces that deserve further investigation: I remember that our magazine "The Edge of Reality" was one of the first English-speaking media to disseminate not only the then booked project "La Campana"-which is a belated effort to generate a revolutionary energy system but only some elements of the prototype developed for the purpose of the Second World War were brought Argentina.
On the other hand, I think it's important to be very careful in this area: the charm of the conquest of space and secret experiments in this direction can inadvertently become a neo-Nazi propaganda weapon.
What could you tell us about the Argentine Roswell? I refer to the case Bariloche
That first not call it "Roswell argentino", as long as Roswell illustrates a "ovnicrash" or precipitation of a UFO to land, and this was not the case Bariloche, which I referred. But I maintain that we had a "Roswell own" is the "case Salta", 17 August 1995, where hundreds of people watched a luminous object of erratic behavior that bterminó exploding and falling debris in inaccessible areas of Cordillera.
Have you gone through a dark night of the soul? If so, when? What values \u200b\u200bare abandoned at this juncture in your life? How did you feel when you broke?
Two. At age 24, when I wondered if it was time to leave this whole area to be more harmonious with the system. Gave and sold my library of nearly 1,000 volumes. I focused in journalism and teaching martial arts. Lasted three months. And back. The second, two years ago, marriage was in crisis with culpógena thing to think about two children and a wife who could feel "ashamed" in a retrograde society where I live, his father - husband parapsychologist and esoteric. This time, rather than part with a library of marriage and've gone fully live today with children proud of what his father and the satisfaction of having discovered that even one can be "muddied" by the environment.
One of your books entitled "Aliens in the Argentine past." I gather that you are then an advocate of the theory of non-humans visit the ancient earth. What is your opinion of Erich Von Daniken?. In Argentina, what references would refer as an example of this thesis? What kind of signs or symbols have been of these aliens paleovisitas recorded histories, customs, etc..?
is almost a sport to hit the patriarchs. In Argentina, this happened to Fabio Zerpa, I confess my sin as a teenager to have been part also of this "crusade" inquisitorial with whom acusábamos of "trading with UFOlogy" (since the beginning fundamentalism, we saw almost as a sacred religion.) And the same goes for Däniken. What Paleoastroarqueología scholar only started reading your books?. Who is not thrilled with "Memories of the Future"?. Beyond the inevitable errors, inevitable in our human nature is someone who, I think, we owe much. First, having lit the sacred flame.
As the findings in the country, not the magnificence of which we can point elsewhere, but they provide his own. Ceramics of calchaquíes, in the northwest, in many cases illustrating discoidal objects flying over people in a clear attitude of wonder. O Guarani legends, such as "Pombero", a being small, blond, which moves in the air clinging to a light pole, also known as "Yacíyateré." In the etymology of their names is a big secret. Because "Pombero" means "out of a flat hood.", And "perhaps a being emerging from a" flat bell "does not make us think of a UFO?. Y "yaciyateré" means "out of the moon falling," which exempts me from all other comments. Also, chronic Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa, a English conquistador in the Costs of Patagonia during travel suswan described the flight of bright objects on a grade. Or the pictographs of Cerro Colorado, Córdoba province, which shows strange beings with disk-shaped craft taking off in clear attitude.
Tell me about your references. Do you recognize any influence over your writing style?
Two, Borges and Ignacio Rojas Darnaude. But both have literally swallowed without doubt I'm being unfair by not mentioning dozens of feathers, now masked in my prose for the time and my bad memory.
As we all know autodefinís you as politically incorrect, I ask that your "quality" has taken away opportunities do you? Do you remember any occasion on which was your lifeline?
I never have been functional and other problems. Or at least, made me lose economic opportunities, media, academic. I left the School of Psychology, slamming the door for arguing too much with the teachers in the city I live, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina, the local church has even preach from the pulpit against me, I've been censored news media, I have raised twice radio programs for compulsive my statements and I started with short shrift to political figures who have approached me to join their ranks. And come back to visit each and every one of those steps.
How do you feel to be almost a prophet in your hometown?
think I am not at all and even if I were, I would make no difference. BTW: I have a useful indifference to praise or criticism.
do you feel when you realize you're also recognized abroad?
With all due respect, just as if I'm recognized on the "inside." I do not suffer the social and long Cholulans I learned to look at the Earth without dotted lines.
Ufólogos admired
A long list, I'm afraid I can leave out so many will not mention any. Furthermore, "UFO" is an absurd reduction: I admire people, intellectual giants, tenacious spirit, brilliant prose, thoughts bold and controversial, people who play by their passions.
Do not you get tired of writing?
should?
How do you cover so many activities? "Hyperactivity obsessive?
obsessive curiosity that only metabolized through everything I do, actually. My friends say that one day my curiosity lead me to the grave. To fill the time while I write and reflect. And the fact I feel a choice: Out of my children, there are two things I love most in life: being a nomad and investigate the paranormal, and I devote myself full time. When all around me spend so many people worried about their jobs, their mortgage, social work, the fight with the neighbors, I can not help a rueful smile. There is "another way" to address life, but apparently not very popular.
What is the recipe to make everything right and up, even brilliantly?
I do not know, but do not worry when you find someone who does so, I ask of you.
What annoys you?
Mediocrity.
What on you crazy woman, for good?
The delicate chemistry between intelligence and sex.
What in a woman makes you crazy, evil?
Mediocrity.
An ideal
As for my life, it is very Taoist, that nothing disrupts the flow of wei wu wei. And by the way, reaching to answer a few questions.
Thanks, Gus. Until next
MIR
[1] My father used tell me that in those years the editors went through the bars "intellectuals" of Buenos Aires ( La Paz, La Giralda
, Opera, Tortoni) in search of writers who publish them. I still resent my parents for not having given birth to, say, fifteen years earlier.
[2] All this without going into details like that skeptics seem to have more than one truth at the same time to explain the case: while Agostinelli insists " Che, UFO, "he admits almost mumbled something Uset between teeth, to whom it was difficult to interview in the interview Giménez implicitly recognizes that just had a word who moreover it does not seem to be quite sure if they invented the case or made a version that already people commented "- was Peter Rogerson in " Notes to a Revisionist, History of Abduction (Part 4): Recovering the forgotten records " (Magonia No. 50, September 1994) who reported that in the city of Buenos Aires confirmed to him that the case was all a lie to hide and to justify the days of the disappearance of Ms. Vidal while he was hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital. So if more than one "truth" to explain this case, then why not point out that probably both are false?
0 comments:
Post a Comment